Are Electoral Coalitions Harmful for Democratic Consolidation in Africa?
نویسنده
چکیده
Electoral coalitions are becoming increasingly popular among opposition parties in Africa because they offer many advantages with respect to reducing party fragmentation and increasing incumbent turnovers. At the same time, however, they are often comprised of parties that are defined predominantly by their leaders’ personalities and exhibit little differentiation in terms of their policy orientation. Based on a dataset spanning all opposition coalitions since 2000 in Africa’s electoral democracies, this paper demonstrates not only that coalitions rarely defeat incumbents but also that they are only competitive when major opposition parties are involved. More significantly, the paper highlights that in many countries, a sizeable share of total electoral volatility is due to fluctuations in voting for opposition parties that have belonged to coalitions. The paper argues that such volatility reflects the inability of coalition members to build loyal constituency bases over time, which is critical for party development and broader consolidation.
منابع مشابه
Pre-electoral Coalitions, Party System and Electoral Geography
Between 1999 and 2009, since no single party was in a position to lead a majority in the Lok Sabha, preelectoral coalitions have become the only option for parties to exercise executive power at the Centre. Looking at the trajectory of two pre-electoral coalitions over ten years, namely the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance and the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance, the paper attempts...
متن کاملEntangled in Electoralism and Narcissistic Leadership Disorder?:Furthering Democracy Beyond Electoral Procedures in Africa
Democratic elections are widely recognized as a foundation of legitimate government. Despite significant steps towards democratisation in the last two decades, problems of consolidation are evident in Africa. In several countries, semiauthoritarian regimes persist while leadership failure becomes a common denominator across the governance spectrum. Yet,leadership is a necessary factor in every ...
متن کاملElectoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More Than Others
Standard political economy models of redistribution, notably that of Meltzer and Richard (1981), fail to account for the remarkable variance in government redistribution across democracies. We develop a general model of redistribution that explains why some democratic governments are more prone to redistribute than others. We show that the electoral system plays a key role because it shapes the...
متن کاملDemocratic Governance and the Challenge for security in Africa: Lessons from Kenya
In the last two decades, democratic politics and practices have taken a significant leap in Africa. Many countries have enthroned competitive multiparty democracy, and the political space has been gradually liberalised with political parties and civil society organizations receiving a new lease of life. Ethno-regional diversities have also been given political expression and accommodation. Marg...
متن کاملForeign Aid and Democratic Development in Africa
Over the past two decades, donors increasingly linked foreign aid to democracy objectives in sub-Saharan Africa. Yet systematic research on this topic typically focuses on how aid influences democratic transitions. This study investigates whether and how foreign aid affects the process of democratic consolidation in sub-Saharan Africa by examining two potential mechanisms: (1) the use of aid as...
متن کامل